This blog reports on a workshop in St Andrews this October and the development of a network of researchers interested in using digital/virtual/online methods to study domestic energy practices. Our contribution is different from other posts on this site contributing to proposition 4 (i.e. inventive and multiple methods, units, samples, etc. are particularly useful for exploring practices at different scales, in relation to changing social patterns and variably interconnected actors). Others on this website have previously commented on the effectiveness of multiple and mixed methods (Browne, 2016), which may be dependent on shifting focus between local, contemporary performances and historical trends and wider populations (Morley, 2016), but we are pinning ourselves to articulating the utility (and challenges) of online methods for exploring practices. Continue reading “Katherine Ellsworth-Krebs & Louise Reid – Digital/virtual/online methods and studying domestic energy practices”
- Home
- About
- Propositions for Discussion
- Browse by Proposition
- Browse by Method
- Actor-network research
- Automated photography
- Case studies
- Digital/virtual/online methods
- Ethnography
- Design
- Diaries
- Discourse analysis
- Disruption
- Facet methodology
- Focus groups
- Genealogy of the present
- Habitus analysis
- Historical methods
- Household tours
- Intervention
- Interviewing
- Making
- Mapping
- Media analysis
- Mixed methods
- Multi-sited ethnography
- Network analysis
- Overviews
- Photographic analysis
- Post-structural materialism
- Quantitative methods
- Sampling
- Scrapbooking
- Secondary data analysis
- Sensors
- Situational analysis
- Surveys
- Time use data
- Visual data
- Browse by Author